I'll start and Ms. Urie can add the detail, which she's excellent at.
The contribution agreement evolves. Our job and our mandate is to meet the expectations of the ecosystem. This was in fact detailed and shown in detail in this evaluation that we got from ISED in February 2023. As I said in my opening statement, it was a draft at that point, but was about to be released.
What it says in there is that we have created activities that are important to and necessary for the ecosystem. So in the entire time that we work with ISED, we are always in constant dialogue about what that looks like, what the contribution agreement says, and how we should evolve it. We do this every time that we get new funding. In my tenure, I think there have been four or five contribution agreements—she would know better than I—and each time we try to evolve them to meet the needs of the ecosystem.
Regarding the things in the RCGT report, we disagree with some of the things they think are in contravention. Therefore, we've already raised that with Innovation, Science and Economic Development, and we're having a dialogue about how those things may need to be changed or not. At this point, really what we're talking about is codifying some things that we had had agreement on with ISED in our view. An assistant deputy minister attends every one of our board meetings. We are in continuous dialogue to make sure that we're in compliance and that we are meeting the needs of public policy that have been put forward in terms of innovation, and we expect to be able to continue to do so.
We've already had, as was mentioned by Mr. McConnachie, a first meeting on the management response and implementation plan. We're well on our way. We're looking forward to getting the funds going and flowing again back to entrepreneurs and the passion that we have for them.