Let me go back to the motion. Please give me a second.
Thank you, Ms. Fortier. I am ruling the motion admissible. The difficulty I have, as you can appreciate, is that the language of the previous motion did not specify a timeline. In the absence of any timeline in that motion, this motion—which gives a specific date—is, in my opinion, admissible.
I've asked Mr. Barrett to clarify certain aspects of this motion. Again, we get into this difficulty when motions or amendments are presented on the fly, of what the interpretation is. Of course, it is subjective. Again, based on what was dealt with and not saying specifically what was in that motion.... There was no specific timeline associated with it. That is why I'm ruling this admissible.
Ms. Fortier, you're still on your point of order.
Mr. Barrett, you still have the floor.
Go ahead, Ms. Fortier.