Hang on a second. Let me just try to bring this back.
The first amendment you've proposed, based on what I've seen, is having the dates between January 8 and January 29. Just so we're clear, the original motion had “That, as of January 29”. What you're proposing is “That, between January 8 and January 29, 2024”. Everything else stays the same after that, right up to “process”, and then, for the next part of the amendment you're proposing, which is the same amendment, you're saying that the committee devote at least four meetings to the study.