I would like to request a clarification.
Personally, my understanding of the motion is that the report has been adopted. If the committee has adopted the report but there has been no response as a result of prorogation, it is not up to committee members to revisit the adoption of a report that the committee adopted in a previous legislature. Our goal today is to ensure that the committee, once it has adopted its report, may pursue the motion that led to it, namely, that a response from the government is still needed.
It is possible to read the report and receive the response. If we wish to continue our work or tone it down, that is still possible. I do not think that we, as new committee members, can hold another vote on a report that has already been adopted. To my mind, that would amount to going back on the work that was done before. The goal is not to lose the work that was done and to ensure continuity from one session to the next. It is the parties who decided not to put the same players around the table, but the committee as an institution has already done its work.