You gave a selection of projects as examples. That's all. The decision was made to focus on these five projects of national interest.
First of all, the fact that only five have been selected doesn't mean they're going to happen.
Second, it doesn't say who's going to do them.
Third, we don't know what subsidy or support the government is providing.
Fourth, we don't know who will choose the companies or which ones will be chosen.
In all these cases, we have to look at the interests of companies like Brookfield and so on. However, when it comes to the actual selection of projects, we haven't arrived at a point where we're making a decision that would benefit no one.
Which of those five projects will be the first and second choices? Now, once the project has been decided, it will be necessary to determine who the main actor will be, what the company will be, and so on. At that point, the people responsible for the screens will make decisions as to whether one of these companies, particularly Brookfield, is involved. What will its involvement be? As a leader or stakeholder? As a member of a class? All of those decisions will be made at that time.
Now, the selection itself is not a conflict of interest issue, and the screens don't apply.