Thank you for the question.
I'll follow on what the minister said. Really, the policy rationale behind this links into one of the main pillars of the package, which is more timely and effective reviews. What we're talking about here in terms of “directly affected” will vary on a case-by-case basis, on a project-by-project basis. These are tools we're putting into the tool kit for managers of these projects—panel managers in particular—to be able to manage the process effectively and efficiently.
In the past, “directly affected” has kind of referred to three main areas. We're looking at really focusing our reviews to ensure we're hearing from the right scientific and technical folks. Aboriginal people certainly have big interests in these projects—we know that—so we want to make sure they're included. Also, we want to include people who live close to these projects or within proximity. Those are some of the criteria that have been taken into account in the past, and we'll likely rely on those in the future.