Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I will ask the witnesses to respond briefly. We appreciate their being here tonight. We do have many questions for them.
My next question is around what Mr. Gratton mentions, seeking clarity on a whole range of the bill's “overarching impact”. I'm quoting from your paper, and thank you for providing it.
I'd also like to say this to Mr. Prystay. You mentioned earlier as well concerns around clause 67. The government has said there will be no amendments to this bill. The government has systematically refused amendments and has refused that clarity. We have four nights of hearings and then the government has signalled the bill will be rammed through.
Do you feel, with such an important process, with the questions you've raised here tonight, that this is an effective public policy process, to ram through, without amendments, legislation that you admit raised concerns and questions?