Thank you.
I have one more question I'd like to direct to both of you.
You mentioned, Mr. Meisenheimer, that people don't do inconvenient things unless they have to. We now have a gutting of the environmental assessment process that excludes many Canadians on the basis of the issues they're raising or where they live. We have a process that allows the government to monkey with the NEB process, and we also have a process that ultimately is decided by a minister with cabinet secrecy.
Do both of you feel that this is an appropriate way of approaching environmental assessment, and do you think it leads to the kind of legislation that forces people to do things they might not want to do, but that it's important for public policy and the future of our country and our economy and our environment to do?