Yes. You talk about the next generation of fish. The next generation of fish could very well be produced in areas that didn't have any fish a generation ago. There is an enormous amount in Ontario and elsewhere in this country of highly degraded, formerly productive fisheries habitats. One of the concerns I have with this legislation is that it appears to define those places as not regulated by section 35 because there are no fisheries in those areas. There used to be, but there aren't now. They're not there now because there's dioxin in the sediments or because...there's a list, a very long list, of reasons why fisheries become degraded or disappear from areas.
To me, that is still a fisheries habitat. It should be treated as such and regulated as such.