The short answer is no. Again, that's an answer given partially in ignorance. I don't know why this is being done the way it's being done. Maybe somebody has a reason for it, but we don't know what that is. I would say that the issue of excluding people, which I didn't get to in the first go-round, is actually a real problem for us. We fish for the people of Ontario and for broader markets. We are the only means of access that most people have to the crown's resource in Ontario. Most people don't fish and they don't want to. We do it for them. They have a right to an opinion about these fish, and yet they would not be deemed to be affected, as I understand the law as it's currently cast, and that's a problem.
On May 28th, 2012. See this statement in context.