I don't know if there was a question there, so let me just ask you one.
You said in your comments that we're interested in only commercially viable fisheries, or something like that. That's not what the act says. It says we're going to focus on protecting fisheries of aboriginal.... You could argue whether food, social, or ceremonial fishery has any commercial.... And there's recreational fishery—I'm not sure how you define that one—and commercial fisheries as well. That's our focus.
There is a little bit of a lack of clarity on this. I think some of that came from comments on a leaked document that wasn't anything close to what we have here before us. Would you agree with that?