Thank you. I believe you've asked a three-part question.
First, we as an organization are very results oriented. We believe that legislation like the federal Fisheries Act should be results-oriented as well. Committee members have talked sometimes about perhaps the less than optimal match between intent and outcome. We see a potential for direct improvements in that regard.
Absolutely, on the question of fish stocking, the answer is that multiple benefits are produced from judicious fish stocking. Those can be benefits to ecosystems but also great benefits to people and society as well.
Third, to your question with reference to a new creative idea that may in fact result in more resourcing for conservation initiatives, we appreciate the creative thinking involved there. We have been assured, though, that the requisite monitoring and assessment will be in place and that that suggestion is value-added, so to speak—an entirely new way to enhance contributions, for example, to assessment monitoring and direct habitat enhancement.