Thank you.
Mr. Amos, I take very strong exception to your conclusion that there's no habitat protection under the Fisheries Act. Proposed subsection 35(1) says:
no person shall carry on any work, undertaking or activity that results in serious harm to fish that are part of a commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery, or to fish that support such a fishery
That is a very clear statement of strong habitat protections for key fisheries. How do you square your conclusion with what the bill actually says?