Thanks. I think short answers are the best because we don't have much time here.
I think a focus on key fisheries that people are actually interested in is a good thing, and habitat protection will actually be strengthened for fisheries that people actually care about.
You made the astonishing statement, and I wrote it down: “That environmental process will no longer be conducted”, and I wrote that; you said that, verbatim. You said as well that there is an exemption of pipelines from the Fisheries Act. I find that astonishing, because with the current definition, subsection 35(1) is very clear on the protection of habitat for significant fisheries.
How do you square what you said with what the bill actually says?