Just to reiterate, Ms. Rempel is absolutely right. The majority of screenings are very small projects for which there are no significant adverse environmental impacts. The agency has estimated that 94% of screenings would not pose significant adverse environmental impacts. We had a different number, but at the end of the day, the question is for screenings of larger projects. I name some of them: metal mines below 3,000 tonnes, oil sands below 10,000 cubic metres, offshore projects including exploratory drills of 75 kilometres, all aquaculture projects, all bridge projects. Those are also under screenings. Those are larger projects. Those are projects that can pose significant adverse environmental impacts.
From what I understand, it may be useful to get the agency and ministries before the committee. Our understanding is that because all those are under screenings, they will no longer fall under the federal EA process.