Yes, this is a new provision that does affect us. There has been, in recent years, an increasing interest and determination by DFO on a policy front that fish passage is something it increasingly looks for, but it wasn't something for which it had the same legislative teeth, perhaps. Our industry certainly noticed that was added. It gives an extra degree of ability for DFO to require that, not just on the basis of harm to fish, but actually simply on the basis of requiring or allowing free passage. It's an increasingly new requirement for us.
On May 30th, 2012. See this statement in context.