Mr. Chairman, let me respond to the threat from Ms. Rempel. In response to this motion she suggested that we may end up passing the timeline that has been set by the government, and this will end up being passed without any amendment. If that's not a threat, I don't know what is.
I understand the timeline that has been set, and I don't agree with it one iota. That's been made really clear. All I'm trying to do, within the time that has already been set, is respond to expert evidence we've been provided to hear from the ministers, at the very least. They've offered publicly. If invited by the committee, they will come.
We have a chunk of two hours tomorrow night when we can entertain the ministers. I'll be awfully surprised if they're not in town, because we have a very busy legislative agenda right now. Let's call them in. This is important. You want to get it done and they want to get it done, so let's do what it takes to get it done. We'll do it tomorrow night and the analysts will have the weekend—basically the same time that was allocated by the government—to get this ready for the end of Monday. We'll be done. Heaven forbid we'll even go a little further in our due diligence.