Thank you, Mr. Kamp.
Yes it is, because I feel the fisheries officers and the minister already have substantial latitude to define what constitutes a harm, alteration, or a destruction or disturbance to habitat—the HADD clause.
On May 30th, 2012. See this statement in context.
As an Individual
Thank you, Mr. Kamp.
Yes it is, because I feel the fisheries officers and the minister already have substantial latitude to define what constitutes a harm, alteration, or a destruction or disturbance to habitat—the HADD clause.
See context to find out what was said next.