I'd agree with that. For example, the current review process for the notorious Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline project doesn't look at long-term costs. You have to consider seepage as well as spills. It doesn't look at downstream effects. We're not looking at the full economic, social, cultural, and environmental costs of that project. I think it's a short-sighted one. I think that's why you have already seen a lot of parties remove themselves from it, as they don't believe it's legitimate.
On May 31st, 2012. See this statement in context.