When you said that the people who are for this proposed legislation have had access and those who are perceived to be against it have not, I think that really hit it on the nail. Who are the groups who have had access? What kind of access have they had? What's the legitimate process by which they've had access and other people have been shut out?
As Tony Maas just said, I do think we have experience in being involved in the process. If you're trying to make things more efficient or make things more productive, nobody is against that, as you said. We've been there. We've seen the inefficiencies. We've seen different ways. We have other ideas about how to do it in a more conciliatory and less full-frontal-assault kind of way.