I think that's an entirely good answer. Okay.
I agree with you 100%. While we've invested in research, we have in some ways become a victim of some success in the last number of years. You invest, but then the indirect costs build up.
I had a visit from the Heart and Stroke Foundation saying that by going to 40% of indirect costs, as we proposed in the update, we're actually hurting the not-for-profit charities that can't do that 40%.
I have a 30-second question for Ms. Sholzberg-Gray.
How is the wait times guarantee coming along, in your view?