But my point would be this. Is an investment of $13 billion that yields an annual saving of $700 million not an investment in our future, to fund our social programs?
I'm just trying to get some kind of glimmer of recognition here that what we're doing is not just being stingy Conservatives for the point of it, but we're trying to create an environment in which we have more cashflow going forward to satisfy these very worthy needs. Give me a point, come on.