Exactly. You're actually getting the benefit to the people who need it the most, which is intelligent economic theory, as opposed to this current government's theory.
Ms. Morris, you say in your executive summary, “In the 2006 federal budget, the government set out to improve the prosperity of Canadians by dealing with the challenge of increasing Canada’s productivity and competitiveness.” Then you list three or four items that generously total about $200 million. I don't quite see how you can make that statement and then at the end of your presentation say that we need investing at international competitive levels, federal research, that you want the indirect cost for university research upped to 40%, etc. The two statements don't live in the same universe. In the last budget you got nothing, and this government shows no interest in actually dealing with this issue.
Give me some reason for hope here. If you only got about $120 million to $200 million in the last budget when they were flush with cash, why do you think you're going to get anything in the next round?