Absolutely. I think the point we were making is that the target was too modest—$1 billion per year on $180 billion, or whatever it is in terms of the total budget. There should be room for far more than that. As a matter of fact, as a deliberate design, surely there are programs and services that have been around for so long that new priorities should take their place, even if we were to maintain spending at the same level. But the hope is that ultimately we may be able to whittle it down.
I come back to the question of looking ahead to an aging population and the advice from the OECD and so on. We really must continue the debt reduction. Cutting current expenditures will help us move in that direction.