I would suggest that the broader perspective is the appropriate one. So for example, to the extent that debt is paid down, it frees up additional moneys for other purposes. I wouldn't restrict it to the core. I think the government has to look at everything and ask whether what they're doing, including for example the amount of debt they're carrying, is appropriate.
You've mentioned the armed forces. We aren't spending enough there, so in fact reallocation is a part of it. Certainly, if we look at our obligations opposite our partners in NATO, we should probably be closer to 2% of GDP rather than the 1.1% or 1.2%--