What if there were a parallelism, in the sense that the emission targets were compulsory for both auto and energy--would that be acceptable?
On October 5th, 2006. See this statement in context.
On October 5th, 2006. See this statement in context.
October 5th, 2006 / 11:05 a.m.
Liberal
John McCallum Liberal Markham—Unionville, ON
What if there were a parallelism, in the sense that the emission targets were compulsory for both auto and energy--would that be acceptable?
See context to find out what was said next.