Okay, thank you.
To the Suzuki Foundation, you raise some intriguing ideas with respect to the air being a dumping zone for which there is no cost, really. Yet when you talk to some people, particularly with respect to the Kyoto system of credits, you get this idiotic rhetoric about selling credits to foreign countries, Canadian taxpayers paying the bills, and all that sort of nonsense.
I would be interested in hearing a further development of your idea. How would you create a cost for the abuse of air?