I don't quite understand how you can suck and blow at the same time, how you can ask for more money and criticize the government for cutting program spending. If we're going to reallocate resources, it is all about choices. For example, we give $245 million a year to museums and we cut $2.3 million in administrative expenses, so we're still giving stable funding of $245 million.
I'm just a little concerned that CARP is trying to now play the role of a social advocate here. You had some excellent points in your brief, and you're not helping your cause here when you're criticizing us for trying to keep government within the economic framework.
I know we're going to run out of time here, but--