Okay, just time for housing.
Mr. Elliott, I certainly agree with the thrust of what you said. But it's also true that in one of the supplementary papers to the budget the government wanted to have a clearer definition of the roles of the federal government versus the provincial governments. Out of the three examples they gave, one specifically singled out was housing and homelessness as something purely provincial. So it looks as though the government is unlikely to support social housing, because it said pretty clearly that it is provincial and not federal.
What's your view of that position, and what would be the implications of following through with it?