Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I do want to ask a couple of questions. I know I only have five minutes, so I'm going to jump right into it.
Mr. Séguin, I have a couple of points. During your presentation you articulated that you were looking for new, predictable, and sustainable funding. That's contrary to the way the MAP program is run; it's allocated on a grants basis.
I take from your comments that you're actually opposed to the direction that MAP was taking with respect to funds being allocated based on applications being submitted and either being turned down or approved. Obviously, if you submit an application there is nothing predictable about whether you are actually going to get the grant.
Sir, can you confirm for me that you're not happy with the MAP program, to begin with?