Thank you very much.
Finally, this is something I did in Vancouver. Our responsibility was to produce a report recommending the overall thrust of the budget, including its components. As matters now stand, the second point of the GST cut, costing $6 billion per year, risks crowding out virtually everything else.
If you don't mind, I would like to do a very quick poll, and I'd ask each of you to give an answer of yes, or no, or no comment.
The question is this. In your view, do you think going the route of the second point of the GST cut is a good idea or not, with “not” being if you think there are better things to spend the money on?
Maybe we could start with Mr. Hayes. Could you answer yes or no, or would you rather not say?