It would appear to be the case, except that the.... Our question from May 2005 on--and we met with a variety of party representatives and MPs and MLAs--is, where is the money? It never came forward. Now the first argument we heard was, “We have to make sure there is a surplus.” In fact, that was part of the legislation, that the money would be available.
Then we were told the Martin government at that point was going to bring forward new measures to incorporate that. Then we had the change in government and what you just pointed out in terms of the infrastructure.
For us on the ground, so to speak, there seemed one obstacle after another, either by federal or provincial governments, to bring that funding forward. That's where a dedicated transfer would help: the money's there and it's going to be used. Instead we have this runaround--