Thank you for the question. I think it's actually a very valid one, and it's one of the things we're pointing to when we say we should be thinking about what is the share that students are paying for their education, because if we start thinking of it in that sort of proportional sense and thinking about what's the value students get back for what they invest in it, then we do start to address that question in some way.
One of the problems is that tuition is rising, and it's offsetting provincial spending, so we certainly think that would point to either a degradation in quality or it would simply keep things at the status quo. If we were to be looking at what that share was, I think we'd see that if tuition was rising, then necessarily that would require provincial spending to be rising. So the overall quality would be maintained.
I think that's a way to look at it, but it's obviously a very difficult question.