I don't really agree, but I'll go on. I think those suffering the most are those with the lowest income, whether they're old or young, and that's the way in which we should ration this good.
I'd like to move on to child care, vis-à-vis how Elizabeth would respond to her neighbours. I would think that the child care argument is primarily a social one, but it can be made in terms of competitiveness. Look at our health care system. The availability of universal health care in Canada versus the lack of it in the U.S. is of huge benefit to companies, to car companies. It seems to me that child care would have the same competitiveness advantage if it were available.
Would you agree with that rationale?