A number of things would impact that small law firm. The first, and I think the most important, from that example is that law societies on their own have imposed a cash prohibition rule on lawyers so that they cannot accept large amounts of cash. They can't accept more than $7,500 in respect of any single transaction. That is a huge vulnerability when you're talking about money laundering, which is moving large amounts of cash.
As well, lawyers are now required to keep separate ledgers in respect of what cash they receive and to attest to the veracity of that ledger. The law societies now make that part of their ongoing audits. When they go into a law firm to audit the books of those law firms, they look at that separate accounting of cash transactions. That is an important step forward in terms of addressing a key vulnerability.
The other point is that those who are doing real estate transactions or any financial transaction in respect of their clients will have had to ID their clients so that they know who it is they are dealing with. If there is an investigation subsequently, law enforcement, going through the Lavallee process that we've talked about, will know that there are actually good files on these clients.