The other problem I have is that I think this bill comes from putting two acts together, one to combat money laundering and one to combat terrorist financing, if I'm not mistaken. I think my colleague John McKay alluded to this.
Are we using the same tools for two different items, two different aspects? Terrorist financing would work in one fashion, whereas even if the money is funnelled through a charity, or they're raising money through a charity, I don't think a money launderer would want to use a charity, because they're trying to launder money.