I think when we looked hard at the program, it was our sense that it could probably be delivered fairly efficiently by a third party entity. While we aren't pleased about the loss of jobs, we think that with the right incentives and the right restructuring, there could be some reduction in the overhead of this program, and that's laid out in our proposal. So we could understand how the government might look at the take-up rate of 3% and conclude that perhaps it wasn't money being spent as well as it could have been. We would dispute the number, but we think there is room for efficiencies and improvements in the program.
On November 9th, 2006. See this statement in context.