A passport mechanism already exists between various regulatory authorities to simply that, but I think you are finally answering my question. You say that in this case, you have to interfere in the province's jurisdiction to respond to a certain national need.
Third, I wanted to talk about cuts, savings you want to make or efficiencies you want to achieve. At the Bloc Québécois, we know they have them. Recently, we looked at the Lénoard Committee report again, in which there was a demonstration that we could easily recover 15.9 billion dollars over the next three years.
However, what concerns me, in the approach taken by the Conservative government so far, is that things are being done backwards. First we cut because we think a program might not be effective, and then we try to see if we will reinvest another way. We have strong examples in the arts, concerning performing groups that are touring around the world. There is the unbelievable example of literacy: first we cut and then we say that we might reinvest in the field later.
Do you, in the future, plan on doing the opposite, namely first assess the programs before creating a commotion and, if needed, make the necessary corrections later?