The motion reads as follows: “At least six hours are to be allocated for these meetings to be held before February 2, 2007”. I am suggesting rather that the six hours of meetings begin before February 2. In that way, there could be a three-hour meeting before February 2, and another afterwards. In this way, we would not have to rush, and we would make sure the witnesses we want to hear from are available.
It is just a detail, but I think it is important that we have this flexibility.