No, you have no point of order yet. I'll acknowledge it when you do. Right now I'm answering your comments.
In reference to the legitimacy of the meeting, Standing Order 106(4) says:
(4) Within five days of the receipt, by the clerk of a standing committee, of a request signed by any four members of the said committee, the Chair of the said committee shall convene such a meeting provided that forty-eight hours' notice is given of the meeting. For the purposes of this section, the reasons for convening such a meeting shall be stated in the request.
That has been done. We've met the Standing Orders of the House of Commons. The meeting is quite legitimate.
I'd ask you to conclude your comments on the amendment proposed by Mr. Paquette, which proposes to include reference to notwithstanding its intent to show support in principle for the intentions of the government's legislation.
Would you conclude your comments now, please?