If there's no surplus amount, then that would be zero? You're saying a person has to contribute the smaller of the two amounts. So, in order to contribute, there have to be surplus amounts.
On February 8th, 2007. See this statement in context.
On February 8th, 2007. See this statement in context.
Pierre Paquette Bloc Joliette, QC
If there's no surplus amount, then that would be zero? You're saying a person has to contribute the smaller of the two amounts. So, in order to contribute, there have to be surplus amounts.
See context to find out what was said next.