In your opinion, it's just not there.
I want to turn to Mr. Barrowclough, because I have very little time.
I can appreciate that you're a pretty angry guy, and pretty legitimately so. You've been deceived. You made these investments, and Mr. Rosen makes a point about the mix of capital and income distributions and how all these schemes are ultimately going to collapse on themselves. We got into a whole war of doublespeak, that this is all about tax fairness and other nonsense like that.
But I'd be curious as to how this business of witness tampering came about. What would people say to you that would suppress you from coming before this committee and telling of your experience?