I find this very strange and ludicrous. First of all, I want to clarify that all we are doing in this section of the bill is adding the words, in paragraph 448.3(1)(a), regarding ATMs. The government's amendment still has that same clause in. It's (a) in their amendment and it's (a) in the bill. So all we are suggesting is that we add those few words to (a). It's not earth-shattering. It's not changing anything. It's simply giving consumers information, that's it.
Could I ask then the government to accept this as a friendly amendment?