This is a separate issue entirely, so I think the same arguments can't be applied to this amendment as were just given to us.
This is based on a strong recommendation from the Consumers' Association of Canada. It has to do with the practices of some financial institutions to advertise a product at a very appealing rate without disclosing that it's a limited product or has a limited timeframe, and that there are other rates at a much higher level for the needs of the consumer.
So it really is an attempt to require the financial institutions to give equal prominence to that sale item, what the other items are, and what the consumer most likely needs. Someone could advertise this great deal at 8%, when in fact it only applies to a very narrow issue or a narrow timeframe. The consumer gets locked into this process and thinks they're getting 8%, when in fact it's 19%.
It's to do in banking what supermarkets do when they advertise Coke on sale for this period of time, and the regular price is such and such. The banks don't have to do anything like that. So it's simply requiring some basic information for consumers.
I hope we can at least support this one.