Okay, thank you.
Not to repeat myself--but I obviously have to--this amendment is not inadmissible because of its scope, but because it “amends a statute that is not before the committee or a section of the parent act unless it is specifically being amended by a clause of the bill”. That's what the problem is here.
I think the members have already shown an interest in or have acquiesced to the fact that we are probably going to hold some studies on the whole issue of electronic payment and automated machines. So it's not within—