As the bill is dealt with today, no, that would not be retroactive. I'll probably speak later in terms of whether we want to simply get at reversing the tax implications for those originally affected versus those today. We do have an amendment proposed, and I think it's been translated. It may be circulated to the clerk, where, on that particular issue, if they simply want to deal with those originally affected under the rules of grandfathering, that could be addressed. But no, we're not looking at retroactivity here with respect to the bill.
