Monsieur Gingras, it would seem imminently logical that if contributions could be made deductible from a person's income, the rate of contribution would increase rather significantly, would it not? Certainly our proponent has said this is the goal, and we realize that. Therefore, the revenue impact would be considerably increased as a consequence of the appeal to be able to deduct the contributions.
So when we say projected revenue impact of over half a billion dollars annually, is that based on current contribution levels?