We've just heard from seven witnesses representing six organizations. We have 11 members, and you took it upon yourself to ask questions as well, making it 12. I think the format is wholly unsatisfactory to many members who would like to ask questions and are not able to. I wonder if there is agreement around the table, when we have multiple witnesses and so many different topics—we had six completely different topics here, on different sections of the budget, and I certainly had questions for these witnesses, as did my colleagues—can we not change the format from seven minutes?
Would there not be agreement around the table for us to go to a different line of questioning, when we have so many topics and so many witnesses and there are so many members and we all have something we want to ask? Would there be agreement around the table for us to have a standard three minutes of questions from members? That would allow more participation.