My question was on Barbados as well, because in fact in the past this has been a focus of considerable debate in Parliament. The Liberals closed a considerable number of tax havens but left Barbados and a couple of others. The Conservatives have identified this as a concern and promised to shut down the Barbados tax haven. It's clearly a lucrative place to go. If Merck Frosst puts $2 billion into Barbados to avoid paying taxes, it means we've left something undone. There is unfinished business.
In the past, when the Liberals were in government, John McKay tried to give me an explanation of why Barbados must stay as a tax haven. Other than the fact that this was the favoured place for Canada Steamship Lines, I don't know of an explanation.
So can you tell us why particularly Barbados has been excluded from the list of tax havens that were shut down?