But if CRA is able to prove that the deduction is coming twice, it's not legal and shouldn't be allowed anyway. That's the difficulty in proving there's a double-dip there.
On May 17th, 2007. See this statement in context.
On May 17th, 2007. See this statement in context.
Liberal
Massimo Pacetti Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC
But if CRA is able to prove that the deduction is coming twice, it's not legal and shouldn't be allowed anyway. That's the difficulty in proving there's a double-dip there.
See context to find out what was said next.